The Heinrichs Safety Triangle: Understanding Workplace Risks

The Heinrich’s law was based on probability and assumes that the number of accidents is inversely proportional to the severity of those accidents. As such using the Heinrich Accident Triangle theory, it suggested that 88% of all accidents were caused by a human decision to carry out an unsafe act. That the conditions leading to a given major process disaster do not relate to slips and trips or your workplace transport accidents does not mean there is nothing to learn from minor accidents and near misses. The 300 words of Inset 1 summarised the results of accident ratio studies, also known as accident triangles. It cited work by the HSE’s Accident Prevention Advisory Unit which confirmed “the general validity of earlier work by safety academics Bird (1969) and Tye and Pearson (1974/75)” on accident ratios, and produced the triangle shown below. Additionally, the study emphasized the importance of accurately defining injury severity when applying the safety pyramid concept.

Heinrich’s Triangle’s worth is found in its emphasis on frequently overlooked minor incidents. By highlighting the connection between minor incidents and major injuries, the triangle serves as a roadmap to a safer workplace, helping organizations identify high-risk scenarios and take preventive measures. These minor incidents, although not severe in themselves, can provide valuable insights into potential hazards within the workplace. What does Heinrich’s triangle tell us about preventing serious accidents in the workplace? Heinrich, suggests a strong predictive relationship between non-injury incidents, minor injuries, and catastrophic events.

Honeywell’s Manufacturing Industry Report

This proactive approach informed by Heinrich’s findings can significantly contribute towards a safer workplace environment. All three pyramids illustrate that there are far more possibilities to learn from minor accidents and near misses than from severe accidents that only occur rarely. It is however debatable whether it is directly possible to reduce the likelihood of severe accidents by reducing minor ones. However, a low number of reported near misses does not necessarily indicate that few incidents have occurred. This is because, when we look at the statistical probability illustrated in the accident triangle, near misses and safety incidents are often simply not reported.

Build your knowledge with ISHN, covering key safety, health and industrial hygiene news, products, and trends.

Over the years, the Safety Triangle has evolved, with various industries adapting it to their specific needs. For example, in the construction industry, the triangle might be adjusted to reflect the higher incidence of near misses due to the hazardous nature of the work. Similarly, in healthcare, the focus might shift towards preventing minor errors that can lead to significant patient harm.

Bird’s statistics are based on insurance statistics available in the 1960s. Hence the ratio of near misses to serious accidents would only be indicative at best today. The link between frequent minor incidents and infrequent major ones is supported by the many stories in this magazine of HSE prosecutions where there was evidence in advance that something could have been done. Discover the importance of work zone safety and how EHS professionals can manage risks through proven strategies and practices. These injuries can be severe enough to require medical attention, such as fractures, amputations, or severe burns. Lost time also affects the company’s overall productivity and can increase the insurance costs for employers.

By focusing on the base, you prevent issues from climbing up the pyramid. The near miss and minor incident analysis reminds us why these controls are there. Bellamy found the triangles were different shapes for different hazards (and not perfect triangles). For every death from being struck by a moving vehicle, for example, she found only four permanent injuries and just eight recoverable injuries — few opportunities, therefore, to learn where improvements need to be made.

Healthcare Facilities

Bird’s Triangle has had a significant impact on modern theories of industrial accident prevention by influencing the mindset and approach towards risk exposure among employees and organizations alike. The accident triangle, also known as Heinrich’s triangle or Bird’s triangle, is a theory of industrial accident prevention. It shows a relationship between serious accidents, minor accidents and near misses. This idea proposes that if the number of minor accidents is reduced then there will be a corresponding fall in the number of serious accidents. The triangle was first proposed by Herbert William Heinrich in 1931 and has since been updated and expanded upon by other writers, notably Frank E. Bird. It is often shown pictorially as a triangle or pyramid and has been described as a cornerstone of 20th century workplace health and safety philosophy.

Tired and lethargic drivers suffer from slow reaction time, decreased concentration, and impaired judgment. These factors may result in road run-offs, sideswipes, and even head-on collisions. Adhering to hours of service regulations and providing rest breaks can help minimize driver fatigue and prevent accidents.

• For example, the possibility of certain serious incidents occurring may not necessarily be indicated by a higher volume of near misses.
• Human factors contribute directly to safety incidents, and safety managers should influence their employees to make better choices.
• It is also argued that this model places too much emphasis on individual blame.
• The Heinrich Accident Triangle which is also known as the Bird’s triangle or accident triangle, is a theory of industrial accident prevention.
• It found that for every fatality, there are approximately 300,000 at risk behaviours.

To truly grasp the impact of Heinrich’s Triangle, a thorough examination of its fundamental principles is necessary. Heinrich, a renowned figure in workplace safety, this concept has transformed our approach to ensuring safe work environments. It asserts that near misses, minor injuries and major injuries are interconnected components comprising what we know as the accident triangle. A key takeaway from Heinrich’s theory is how seemingly insignificant incidents like minor accidents can have serious implications for overall safety. SafetyCulture is a mobile-first operations platform adopted across industries, such as manufacturing, mining, construction, retail, and hospitality.

• Heinrich, an employee of the Traveler’s Insurance Company in the 1930s, published a series of groundbreaking theories on health and safety at work.
• The foundation of this theory lies in establishing a connection between the frequency of minor accidents and an increased likelihood of more severe ones occurring.
• Although sometimes, it is indeed difficult to tell how serious a near miss could have been, especially if the near miss triggered a chain of events that led to a serious incident.
• The theory was developed further by Frank E Bird in 1966 based on the analysis of 1.7 million accident reports from almost 300 companies.
• Introduce rewards for employees who are particularly active in reporting their observations.

Effectively Utilize the Safety Triangle with SafetyCulture

For example, the possibility of certain serious incidents occurring may not necessarily be indicated by a higher volume of near misses. Equally, reducing the number of minor incidents doesn’t necessarily, in practice, reduce fatalities. The main use of these triangles is to heinrich triangle convey the message that serious outcome accidents tend to happened rarely and randomly.

Understanding and applying the Safety Triangle can significantly enhance accident prevention strategies, ultimately leading to a safer work environment. It is important to understand these scenarios to implement effective safety strategies and preventative measures. Heinrich’s Triangle can help identify these potential risks by illustrating the link between serious accidents, minor accidents, and near misses. By prioritizing the prevention and management of both minor accidents and near misses within organizations, the risk for serious incidents can be greatly reduced.

This guide shows how to communicate the value of Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) to company leadership. If managers just say, “well, the controls worked this time, no one was hurt”, they allow the dilution of the barriers designed to prevent the serious outcome, increasing the likelihood of such an event. On 5 February 2010 a bale of insulation fell through a suspended ceiling at a church where two men were insulating the roof space. The men used a harness they had extended with a nylon rope from a DIY shop. On 12 February one of the pair, a volunteer named Lee Bourn, fell through the ceiling and died. The religious charity involved had received a prohibition notice in 2001 after a non-fatal fall from a roof, further evidence it could have prevented the 2010 death if it had learned from experience.

According to the Heinrich Safety Pyramid theory, human error causes 88 percent of all accidents. Our study aimed to find out whether or not the ideas found within the safety triangle are valid. Specifically, we first wanted to understand if near misses and less severe work-related injuries affect the number of work-related fatalities that occur over time in mining establishments. Secondly, we sought to examine if the probability of future work-related fatalities decreases as the severity of near misses and minor injuries decreases—thereby taking on the safety triangle form.

And while Heinrich’s most often cited figure would suggest an emphasis on man-made failures, Heinrich actually suggested that workplaces focus on hazards, not just worker behavior. Occupational safety and health specialists study past work-related illnesses and injuries to understand how to prevent future ones. In the sections below, lead author Patrick Yorio, Ph.D., NIOSH statistician, explains the study, which was published in the journal Risk Analysis. Heinrich’s Law indicates a relationship between major injuries, minor injuries, and near-misses. Heinrich’s most-cited figure states that 88% of all injuries and incidents are caused by a human decision to perform an unsafe act.

These features help you leverage the safety pyramid to its full potential. By focusing on near misses and minor incidents, you can prevent major accidents and ensure a safer workplace. The future of accident prevention strategies lies in integrating the Safety Triangle with other safety management systems and technologies.

BP’s reliance on this data, combined with an inadequateprocess safety understanding, created a false sense of confidence thatBP was properly addressing process safety risks. Predominant causes of no-injury accidents are, in average cases,identical with the predominant causes of major injuries, andincidentally of minor injuries as well. When investigating a worksite, employers and workers are tasked to identify hazards in their operations and shortcomings in their safety and health programs. Most importantly, employers and workers are required to identify and implement the corrective actions necessary to prevent future incidents. It is important that delegates are aware of the various analysis methods available which they can tap on to identify these worksite incidents.